lesson 2 of 4 · acceptance before the build — review against checks, not vibesacceptance before the build — review against checks, not vibeslesson 2 of 4 · acceptance before the build — review against checks, not vibesacceptance before the build — review against checks, not vibeslesson 2 of 4 · acceptance before the build — review against checks, not vibesacceptance before the build — review against checks, not vibeslesson 2 of 4 · acceptance before the build — review against checks, not vibesacceptance before the build — review against checks, not vibeslesson 2 of 4 · acceptance before the build — review against checks, not vibesacceptance before the build — review against checks, not vibeslesson 2 of 4 · acceptance before the build — review against checks, not vibesacceptance before the build — review against checks, not vibeslesson 2 of 4 · acceptance before the build — review against checks, not vibesacceptance before the build — review against checks, not vibeslesson 2 of 4 · acceptance before the build — review against checks, not vibesacceptance before the build — review against checks, not vibeslesson 2 of 4 · acceptance before the build — review against checks, not vibesacceptance before the build — review against checks, not vibeslesson 2 of 4 · acceptance before the build — review against checks, not vibesacceptance before the build — review against checks, not vibeslesson 2 of 4 · acceptance before the build — review against checks, not vibesacceptance before the build — review against checks, not vibes
Rewind to before the Deloitte report shipped. The delivery lead gets to add ONE acceptance check to the spec. Which one catches the failure that actually happened — the fabricated references and the invented federal-court quote?